ISO 45001 is now published
The world’s much anticipated International Standard for occupational health and safety (OH&S) has just been published, and is set to transform workplace practices globally.
ISO 45001:2018, Occupational health and safety management systems – Requirements with guidance for use, provides a robust and effective set of processes for improving work safety in global supply chains. Designed to help organizations of all sizes and industries, the new International Standard is expected to reduce workplace injuries and illnesses around the world.
According to 2017 calculations by the International Labour Organization (ILO), 2.78 million fatal accidents occur at work yearly. This means that, every day, almost 7 700 persons die of work-related diseases or injuries. Additionally, there are some 374 million non-fatal work-related injuries and illnesses each year, many of these resulting in extended absences from work. This paints a sober picture of the modern workplace – one where workers can suffer serious consequences as a result of simply “doing their job”.
ISO 45001 hopes to change that. It provides governmental agencies, industry and other affected stakeholders with effective, usable guidance for improving worker safety in countries around the world. By means of an easy-to-use framework, it can be applied to both captive and partner factories and production facilities, regardless of their location.
David Smith, Chair of project committee ISO/PC 283 that developed ISO 45001, believes the new International Standard will be a real game changer for millions of workers: “It is hoped that ISO 45001 will lead to a major transformation in workplace practices and reduce the tragic toll of work-related accidents and illnesses across the globe.” The new standard will help organizations provide a safe and healthy work environment for workers and visitors by continually improving their OH&S performance.
Smith adds: “World standards writers have come together to provide a framework for a safer workplace for all, whatever sector you work in and wherever you work in the world.” More than 70 countries were directly involved in the creation of this important document, developed by ISO/PC 283, Occupational health and safety management systems, with the British Standards Institution (BSI) serving as the committee secretariat.
Because ISO 45001 is designed to integrate with other ISO management systems standards, ensuring a high level of compatibility with the new versions of ISO 9001 (quality management) and ISO 14001 (environmental management), businesses that already implement an ISO standard will have a leg up if they decide to work toward ISO 45001.
The new OH&S standard is based on the common elements found in all of ISO’s management systems standards and uses a simple Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) model, which provides a framework for organizations to plan what they need to put in place in order to minimize the risk of harm. The measures should address concerns that can lead to long-term health issues and absence from work, as well as those that give rise to accidents.
ISO 45001 will replace OHSAS 18001, the world’s former reference for workplace health and safety. Organizations already certified to OHSAS 18001 will have three years to comply with the new ISO 45001 standard, although certification of conformity to ISO 45001 is not a requirement of the standard.
The International Accreditation Forum (IAF) has developed the migration requirements to help certified organizations, certification bodies, accreditation bodies and other interested parties prepare. For more information, see the IAF Website.
ISO 45001:2018 can be purchased from your national ISO member or through the ISO Store.
- Published in News
The Bottom Line Impact of Health and Safety Training
The Alcoa Story
In his book The Power of Habit, author Charles Duhigg writes about Alcoa’s president, Paul O’Neill, and how he transformed the aluminum manufacturing giant into one of the safest, and most profitable, companies in America. This excerpt from Duhigg’s book describes O’Neill’s plan.
On a blustery October day in 1987, a herd of prominent Wall Street investors and stock analysts gathered in the ballroom of a posh Manhattan hotel. They were there to meet the new CEO of the Aluminum Company of America — or Alcoa, as it was known — a corporation that, for nearly a century, had manufactured everything from the foil that wraps Hershey’s Kisses and the metal in Coca Cola cans to the bolts that hold satellites together.
A few minutes before noon, the new chief executive, Paul O’Neill, took the stage. He looked dignified, solid, confident. Like a chief executive.
Then he opened his mouth.
“I want to talk to you about worker safety,” he said. “Every year, numerous Alcoa workers are injured so badly that they miss a day of work. I intend to make Alcoa the safest company in America. I intend to go for zero injuries.”
The audience was confused. Usually, new CEOs talked about profit margins, new markets and ‘synergy’ or ‘co-opetition.’ But O’Neill hadn’t said anything about profits. He didn’t mention any business buzzwords.
Eventually, someone raised a hand and asked about inventories in the aerospace division. Another asked about the company’s capital ratios.
“I’m not certain you heard me,” O’Neill said. “If you want to understand how Alcoa is doing, you need to look at our workplace safety figures.” Profits, he said, didn’t matter as much as safety.
The investors in the room almost stampeded out the doors when the presentation ended. One jogged to the lobby, found a pay phone, and called his 20 largest clients.
“I said, ‘The board put a crazy hippie in charge and he’s going to kill the company,’” that investor told me. “I ordered them to sell their stock immediately, before everyone else in the room started calling their clients and telling them the same thing.
Within a year of O’Neill’s speech, Alcoa’s profits would hit a record high. By the time O’Neill retired in 2000 to become Treasury Secretary, the company’s annual net income was five times larger than before he arrived, and its market capitalization had risen by $27 billion. Someone who invested a million dollars in Alcoa on the day O’Neill was hired would have earned another million dollars in dividends while he headed the company, and the value of their stock would be five times bigger when he left.
What’s more, all that growth occurred while Alcoa became one of the safest companies in the world.
Duhigg wrote about O’Neill in the context of focusing on one key habit, in this case worker safety, and how changing that one thing had a powerful and profound impact on an entire company’s culture.
Safety in Health Care
In an extensive interview with the Post-Gazette, O’Neill, who left Alcoa in 2000, describes his work on health care reform, and in particular, on improving safety for health care workers and patients.
“It’s been a frustrating experience.”
O’Neill was involved in one of the earliest experiments on reducing bloodstream infections, at Allegheny General Hospital. In a 2006 study published in the Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, he, and a hospital group led by Richard Shannon, showed that a team-based approach to analyzing and reducing bloodstream infections in an AGH intensive care unit lowered infections from 49 to 6 in a year, and cut deaths from 19 to 1.
Such dramatic improvements occurred in the three intensive care units at Allegheny General overseen by Dr. Shannon, O’Neill said.“But then, we couldn’t even get the then-president of the hospital to adopt practices in the other ICUs that we had proven could save lives. It’s showed me that it’s really hard to get good, scientifically proven ideas through plasterboard walls.”
One major problem with patient safety initiatives in American hospitals, he said, is that “they are projects; they are not efforts to create an organizational culture. Most projects will create incredible results for a short period of time, but there’s a wasting away back toward normal because the changes don’t belong to the culture, they belong to a project.”
O’Neill’s story isn’t just about changing habits, it’s also about leadership, and how change – true and lasting change – occurs when leaders become committed to an ideal.
Changing Organizational Culture
Improving safety in a company may require a major cultural shift.
Culture influences everything: how an organization identifies and solves business problems, recovers from failures, and thrives in times of success. It serves as a guiding force for employee behavior, shaping mindsets, attitude, and effort.
Changing culture happens when leaders make a conscious effort to align behaviour with strategy. All too often, top leaders boast about making a cultural shift – but then their daily actions, discussions, incentives, and openness to new ideas remain the same. Nothing truly changes.
The chances of true organizational change improve If all levels of leadership have an opportunity to shape the culture direction and trust that the changes (and sometimes sacrifices) they’re asked to make will be worth the effort.
Employees look to the person they trust – often their manager – and ask, “Do you believe in this?” The manager’s ultimate belief in the change is critical to its success. What is said (and not said), what is done (and not done), dictates whether the change will influence a broader group of employees.
Safety Is Not a Trade-off
Safety is often viewed as a competing interest in an organization. “Do you want to be safe, or do you want to make money?”
But is there really a trade off between saving money and saving lives?
In 2010, EHS Today featured a workplace safety study by VitalSmarts, which had examined 420 supervisors and managers, dividing them into two groups. The leaders in the first group were selected because they held their people accountable for every aspect of safety. The leaders in the second group were selected because they did not. The researchers wanted to test whether there were trade offs between safety and other priorities, or whether accountability in safety predicted success across all other priorities.
The findings couldn’t be more dramatic.
When the 20 percent of leaders who focused most on safety were compared to the other 80 percent, the safety-focused leaders were five times more likely to be in the top 20 percent on productivity, quality, efficiency, and employee satisfaction. The data clearly showed that being the best in workplace safety also leads to excellence in each of these other areas.
These results held true across industries as different as oil and gas exploration, chemical manufacturing, power generation, and construction. Regardless of the industry, the leaders who are best at holding their people accountable for safety also achieve the best quality, highest productivity, and greatest efficiency.
The Bottom Line
The United States Department of Labor reports that businesses spend $170 billion a year on costs associated with occupational injuries and illnesses – expenditures that come straight out of company profits.
But workplaces that establish effective and accountable health and safety programs can reduce their injury and illness costs by 20 to 40 percent. In today’s business environment, these costs can be the difference between operating in the black and running in the red.
Work-related injuries, illnesses, and deaths are costly to everyone. A safe and healthy work environment pays, in more ways than one. A safe workplace not only protects workers from injury and illness, it can also lower injury/illness costs, reduce absenteeism and turnover, increase productivity and quality, and raise employee morale.
Here is the bottom line: companies that focus on worker safety are simply better. Safety is good for business.
- Published in Online Training Courses
Different Learning Activities for Different Learning Styles
Different Learning Styles
Everyone learns in different ways. Some people like to jump in and get their hands dirty, learning by doing. Others like to sit back and listen to someone more experienced explain how a thing is done. Finally, there are others who prefer to read up on a topic.
There are three main learning styles: visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. Most people learn best through a combination of these three different styles, but typically favour one over the other.
- Visual Learners like to LOOK. They learn best by looking at pictures, videos, graphics, watching a demonstration, or reading up on a topic. Visual learners are able to memorize and recall written information better than other types of learners. For visual learners, it may be difficult to absorb new information from an instructor who is simply talking to them.
- Auditory learners like to LISTEN. They learn best by listening to things being explained, by reciting information out loud, and may concentrate better with soft music playing in the background. For auditory learners, it may be more difficult to process new information if all they’re doing is reading about it.
- Kinesthetic learners like to TOUCH. They learn best by actually doing an activity and having a “hands-on” experience. For kinesthetic learners, sitting still and reading may make it difficult to absorb new information.
Different Learning Activities for Different Learning Styles
The future of online training has arrived. The most effective online training programs are those that use different types of learning activities to better engage with the three main learning styles. Effective training programs use visuals, layered with audio voiceovers, and supplemented by interactive activities, or blended with hands-on learning.
The types of learning activities included in a course should depend upon the course audience, the material being taught, and the course length. Best practice teaches us it’s important to include a learning interaction every 5-10 minutes to reinforce the most relevant information covered.
Many online training developers are using a concept called ‘gamification’ which takes elements from game design and incorporates it into the online learning environment. The four most common gamification techniques are:
- Drag and Drop – These type of activities require a learner to pick up an object and move it with the mouse to a new location to elicit a response. They are the most common type of game-based activity used to engage learners and reinforce training material.
- Matching Activities – Matching activities ask the learner to make connections between objects. They are great for reinforcing definitions and testing understanding of relationships. Though terms and phrases are common in matching activities, symbols and pictures can be used to add visual interest.
- Hot Spots – Hot spots are locations on pictures that a learner can hover over with the mouse, click on, or drop an object onto in order to reveal information or elicit a correct response. Hot spots can ask learners to identify objects or merely be used to offer a more engaging way to provide additional information.
- Sequencing – Sequencing activities test a learner’s ability to place terms, procedures, objects, or images into logical order. Sequencing activities are great for testing learners’ recall of step-by step procedures and for providing students with an opportunity to practice the procedures as well.
- Published in Online Training Courses
Finding the Best Online Safety Training Programs
Under Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Regulations, all employers have an obligation to ensure the workplace is safe. To make sure employees know how to stay safe on the job, employers must provide training to teach workers how to recognize potential hazards and how to safely use, handle, store, and dispose of hazardous substances. Employees must also be taught how to handle emergencies on the job.
Whether you’re in the construction industry, retail, manufacturing, electrical trade, or oil and gas sector, safety training is mandatory.
Safety training is instruction with site-specific information and occupation-specific procedures addressing worker safety. Training is an important part of understanding the hazards that may be present at a workplace, and preventing injuries on the job.
For some employers, providing the required safety training for all their employees and supervisors can be a challenge. In the past, many companies provided safety training in-house. However, over the past decade, we’ve seen a rise in the utilization of online safety training.
Online training is a cost-effective, flexible, and convenient form of safety training and is available from a host of different training companies. But how does an employer decide which safety training program is best for its workers and for the company?
Online Safety Training: What to Look For
The company you select to provide your online safety training should help you through every step in the education and certification process. Here are some of the most important factors to consider when choosing the best online safety training program provider:
- Wide selection of courses: Choose a company that has all the accredited courses needed to meet the OHS legislated requirements, as well as courses the company might require in the future to address potential growth. Selecting a company that offers a comprehensive library of online safety courses means employers don’t have to shop around for courses; they can enjoy one-stop shopping.
- Cost savings: One of the greatest advantages of online training is its cost-effectiveness. Ideally, the program you select should have options that maximize savings for your company. Look for online training companies that provide group discounts, corporate accounts, or discounts for specific industry members.
- Help and support: An online training program should offer users technical support as part of the training package. The last thing you want is for students to get stuck with a product they can’t use or courses they can’t complete because of technical problems.
- Training is competency-based: Competencies are the skills and knowledge required to complete a specific job. Many companies now use competency-based assessments to determine what training employees need to be successful in their work and to improve their effectiveness. An online training program that defines the competencies a specific program will address, helps supervisors and employees find the best training solutions.
- Content is interactive: No matter how good online training content is, if learners are not engaged it’s likely their attention will be lost. Learning activities that require the learner to interact with the material increases focus and retention. For example, drag and drop activities ask the learner to pick up an object with the mouse and move it to a new location in order to elicit a response, complete a task, or obtain a correct answer.
- Uses real-world images: Some learners lose interest quickly in a program if they feel it doesn’t apply to them or their work. For example, cartoon-type graphics used in a training program can quickly leave an adult learning feeling uninterested or patronized. Effective online training should use real-world pictures and simulations, including video clips, technical animation, and decision trees.
- Low mechanical repetition: Often online courses are developed as glorified PowerPoint decks, with little interaction between the student and the material. Essentially, the student just keeps clicking an advance arrow to take them to the next slide. This repetitiveness becomes automatic and the student grows bored with the material. Ideally, coursework should require a variety of tasks, with an activity every 5 – 10 minutes to keep students interested and excited to find out what’s coming next.
- Voiceovers are used: There are several different types of learning styles. Some people are readers and some are listeners. Courses that use a combination of visuals, reading, and audio voiceovers have proven to be the most effective way to deliver online content, and meet the needs of a broader range of students.
- Content is current: The Occupational Health and Safety landscape is not static; it is constantly changing. The best training programs are those that are responsive to changes in the regulations, as well as the best practices in a broad spectrum of industries.
- Uses a variety of testing: In the same way that repeated clicking tends to become monotonous and lower efficacy, using the same testing methods throughout the training program can also lead to disengagement. Courses should use a variety of testing including multiple choice, true or false, and fill-in-the-blank. To ensure that no two exams are ever the same, each learner should be presented with an exam comprised of questions randomly chosen from a central question pool. This is particularly important for learners who have to re-test in the same program.
- Published in Online Training Courses
CAPP Code of Practice for Confined Space, Final Draft
TO: CAODC Board of Directors
TO: CAODC Drilling and Service Rig Executive Members
TO: CAODC Drilling and Service Rig Registered Representatives
TO: CAODC Drilling and Service Rig Members
FOR IMMEDIATE REVIEW: CAPP Code of Practice for Confined Space, Final Draft
________________________________________
The DRAFT Code of Practice for Confined Space, developed by the CAPP Health and Safety Steering Committee, is scheduled to be approved January 15, 2018. Please take the time to review this document at your earliest convenience. Please send feedback to ktonge@caodc.ca on or before 12:00 PM Friday, January 12, 2018.
To access a copy of the DRAFT Code of Practice, click here (note that the file is a download. If after clicking the hyperlink it does not open automatically, please check your download folder) or log into the CAODC website and refer to the Industry Review webpage.
Further information from CAPP is as follows:
Overview
Industry identified an opportunity to improve our approach to confined space regulation and policy, thereby creating potential efficiencies and mitigating risk for members. An Industry Confined Space Task Group was struck to support this work, with representation from CAPP, PSAC, CAODC, CAGC, EPAC and Enform. A draft framework was created, circulated widely for review, and is now ready for approval.
Key Messages
- Working in or around a confined space is a high-risk activity. Across Canada, a significant number of people are killed or seriously injured in confined spaces each year. This happens in a wide range of industries, from those involving complex plants to simple storage vessels. Those affected include people working in the confined space and those who try to rescue them, often without appropriate training and equipment.
- The regulations governing confined space activities vary significantly from one jurisdiction to the next. The analysis of the cross-jurisdictional review concluded that it was not possible, even with major changes, to develop a single harmonized confined space regulation that would meet the requirements in each jurisdiction. As a result, a confined space regulatory framework was initiated to achieve the identified safe work objectives.
- This Code of Practice for Confined Space was developed by the upstream oil and gas industry to provide Canadian regulators with a recommendation for the harmonization of Federal, Provincial and Territorial confined space regulatory requirements. Codes of Practice set out industry standards of conduct and provide guidance to employers, supervisors, contractors, and workers that can be used – AS AN OPTION – to meet and/or exceed the requirements of OHS legislation.
Next Steps
Upon approval of the Code of Practice at the CAPP HSSC meeting in January,
- An engagement plan with the regulators will be initiated; and
- An issue proposal for development by Energy Safety Canada will be submitted.
Copyright © 2018 Canadian Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors, All rights reserved.
You’re receiving this email because you’re listed as your organization’s Registered Representative or you’re included as a contact in an email distribution list kept by Kelli Tonge. Please be advised that unsubscribing will not remove you from these email distributions lists or revise your status as the Registered Representative.
Our mailing address is:
Canadian Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors
2050, 717 – 7 Ave
Calgary, Alberta T2P 0Z3
Canada
Add us to your address book
Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list
- Published in News, Uncategorized
Bill 30 – Proposed Changes to Alberta WCB Act and OHS Act
Bill would improve safety, well-being of Albertans
November 27, 2017 Media inquiries
Proposed changes to the Workers’ Compensation Act and Occupational Health and Safety Act would better protect Albertans and support injured workers.
If passed, An Act to Protect the Health and Well-being of Working Albertans would improve workplace health and safety and provide fair compensation and meaningful support to injured workers and their families. The changes would also ensure Alberta workers have the same rights and protections as other Canadians.
“Every Albertan should be able to go to work and come home healthy and safe at the end of the workday. When they don’t, they deserve to have access to the medical and financial support they need to get healthy, care for their families and return to work. This bill would better protect hardworking Albertans and provide fair compensation to Albertans injured on the job.”
Christina Gray, Minister of Labour
The bill would modernize Alberta’s health and safety system to reflect modern workplaces, increase employee participation, improve safety, and increase supports to injured workers.
“The proposed changes to the occupational health and safety system are generally in line with the oil and gas industry’s best practices. Our objective as a safety association is to develop and support standards and best practices across the oil and gas industry and we see these changes as a positive step forward in advancing worker health and safety in Alberta.”
John Rhind, CEO, Energy Safety Canada
“Even one tragedy – one fatality, one life-altering injury, one occupational disease – is too many. Threads of Life is dedicated to a world where these tragedies become morally, socially and economically unacceptable, so that all workers return home safe and healthy to their families. We support Alberta’s steps to help move us as Canadians closer to that vision.”
Shirley Hickman, executive director, Threads of Life
The Workers’ Compensation Board (WCB) provides no-fault benefits and supports a safe return to work for injured workers. The proposed changes would mean an improved WCB system that provides greater benefits to workers to support their return to work, with premiums that remain sustainable and affordable for employers.
Alberta’s Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Act sets the minimum standards for workplace health and safety, and outlines the roles and responsibilities of employers and employees. These proposed changes would better protect workers, ensure they have the same rights and protections as other Canadians, and empower them to participate in health and safety in Alberta’s workplaces.
The proposed changes result from government’s review of the OHS system and the independent review of the WCB system. If passed, the majority of changes to WCB and OHS would come into effect Jan. 1 and June 1, 2018, respectively.
Bill highlights:
If passed, the legislation would provide better protections and benefits to Albertans by:
Workers’ Compensation Board changes
- Establishing an independent Fair Practices Office that helps Albertans navigate the WCB system by providing additional resources to support workers every step of the way.
- Establishing a Code of Rights and Conduct that outlines the rights of workers and employers, while also explaining how WCB staff would recognize these rights and conduct.
- Removing the maximum insurable earnings cap of $98,700 per year, allowing injured workers to receive benefits in line with their expected annual earnings.
- Improving benefits for:
-
- Surviving spouses and children when a worker is killed on the job.
- Young workers who sustain a long-term injury that affects their career opportunities.
- Improving retirement benefits for injured workers to better recognize the impact on an injured worker’s retirement savings.
- Providing an option for interim relief while decisions are under review and appeal, helping to reduce potential hardship while disputed claims are being reviewed or awaiting appeal.
- Providing greater choice for injured workers in selecting health professionals.
- Enhancing coverage for psychological injuries, including post-traumatic stress disorder, for all occupations where workers have experienced a traumatic incident at work.
- Requiring employers to continue providing health benefit programs to injured workers under existing coverage for one year after the date of the injury.
- Establishing an Occupational Disease and Injury Advisory Committee that would review occupational diseases, and provide advice on emerging trends in medical science.
- Continuing to allow the WCB to determine how the Accident Fund is used.
- Introducing an obligation for employers to support the “return to work” of workers who suffer injuries and illnesses in their workplaces. Employers will have a duty to accommodate workers to the point of undue hardship.
Occupational Health and Safety changes
- Enshrining the three basic rights of workers in Alberta’s legislation:
-
- The right to refuse unsafe work. The proposed changes protect workers from any form of reprisal for exercising this right, including loss of compensation or benefits.
- The right to know. The proposed changes ensure workers are informed about potential hazards and have access to basic health and safety information in the workplace.
- The right to participate. The proposed changes ensure workers are involved in health and safety discussions, including participation in health and safety committees.
- Mandating joint worksite health and safety committees for workplaces with 20 or more employees. These committees are responsible for:
-
- inspecting the work site for hazards
- helping employers respond to health and safety concerns of workers
- helping resolve unsafe work refusals
- helping develop health and safety policies and safe work procedures
- helping with new employee health and safety orientation
- developing and promoting education and training programs.
- Requiring employers with between five and 19 workers to have a health and safety representative in the workplace.
- Clarifying roles and responsibilities of workplace parties for health and safety, including the obligations of employers, supervisors, workers, owners, prime contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, service providers, self-employed persons and temporary staffing agencies.
- Protecting workers from workplace violence and harassment. This includes new legislative definitions as well as outlining the responsibility of employers and supervisors to prevent workplace violence and harassment, and workers to refrain from these activities.
- Protecting workers from loss of wages or benefits on worksites subjected to stop work or stop use orders or while safety improvements are being made.
- Requiring employers to report “near miss” incidents to OHS. A “near miss” incident is one that had the potential to cause serious injury to a person but did not.
- Expanding the ability of the courts to impose creative sentences, such as providing funding for research on preventative medicine or health and safety training programs.
- Requiring the government to publish more information collected during compliance and enforcement activities, including the results of OHS investigations.
- Requiring OHS laws be reviewed every five years to ensure they remain relevant to modern and changing workplaces.
Related information
- Bill 30: An Act to Protect the Health and Well-being of Working Albertans
- Workplace safety and injury compensation changes
- Occupational Health and Safety system review
- WCB Review
Media inquiries
587-985-9441
Press Secretary, Labour
587-982-5030
Chief of Staff, Labour
- Published in News, Uncategorized