The Bottom Line Impact of Health and Safety Training
The Alcoa Story
In his book The Power of Habit, author Charles Duhigg writes about Alcoa’s president, Paul O’Neill, and how he transformed the aluminum manufacturing giant into one of the safest, and most profitable, companies in America. This excerpt from Duhigg’s book describes O’Neill’s plan.
On a blustery October day in 1987, a herd of prominent Wall Street investors and stock analysts gathered in the ballroom of a posh Manhattan hotel. They were there to meet the new CEO of the Aluminum Company of America — or Alcoa, as it was known — a corporation that, for nearly a century, had manufactured everything from the foil that wraps Hershey’s Kisses and the metal in Coca Cola cans to the bolts that hold satellites together.
A few minutes before noon, the new chief executive, Paul O’Neill, took the stage. He looked dignified, solid, confident. Like a chief executive.
Then he opened his mouth.
“I want to talk to you about worker safety,” he said. “Every year, numerous Alcoa workers are injured so badly that they miss a day of work. I intend to make Alcoa the safest company in America. I intend to go for zero injuries.”
The audience was confused. Usually, new CEOs talked about profit margins, new markets and ‘synergy’ or ‘co-opetition.’ But O’Neill hadn’t said anything about profits. He didn’t mention any business buzzwords.
Eventually, someone raised a hand and asked about inventories in the aerospace division. Another asked about the company’s capital ratios.
“I’m not certain you heard me,” O’Neill said. “If you want to understand how Alcoa is doing, you need to look at our workplace safety figures.” Profits, he said, didn’t matter as much as safety.
The investors in the room almost stampeded out the doors when the presentation ended. One jogged to the lobby, found a pay phone, and called his 20 largest clients.
“I said, ‘The board put a crazy hippie in charge and he’s going to kill the company,’” that investor told me. “I ordered them to sell their stock immediately, before everyone else in the room started calling their clients and telling them the same thing.
Within a year of O’Neill’s speech, Alcoa’s profits would hit a record high. By the time O’Neill retired in 2000 to become Treasury Secretary, the company’s annual net income was five times larger than before he arrived, and its market capitalization had risen by $27 billion. Someone who invested a million dollars in Alcoa on the day O’Neill was hired would have earned another million dollars in dividends while he headed the company, and the value of their stock would be five times bigger when he left.
What’s more, all that growth occurred while Alcoa became one of the safest companies in the world.
Duhigg wrote about O’Neill in the context of focusing on one key habit, in this case worker safety, and how changing that one thing had a powerful and profound impact on an entire company’s culture.
Safety in Health Care
In an extensive interview with the Post-Gazette, O’Neill, who left Alcoa in 2000, describes his work on health care reform, and in particular, on improving safety for health care workers and patients.
“It’s been a frustrating experience.”
O’Neill was involved in one of the earliest experiments on reducing bloodstream infections, at Allegheny General Hospital. In a 2006 study published in the Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, he, and a hospital group led by Richard Shannon, showed that a team-based approach to analyzing and reducing bloodstream infections in an AGH intensive care unit lowered infections from 49 to 6 in a year, and cut deaths from 19 to 1.
Such dramatic improvements occurred in the three intensive care units at Allegheny General overseen by Dr. Shannon, O’Neill said.“But then, we couldn’t even get the then-president of the hospital to adopt practices in the other ICUs that we had proven could save lives. It’s showed me that it’s really hard to get good, scientifically proven ideas through plasterboard walls.”
One major problem with patient safety initiatives in American hospitals, he said, is that “they are projects; they are not efforts to create an organizational culture. Most projects will create incredible results for a short period of time, but there’s a wasting away back toward normal because the changes don’t belong to the culture, they belong to a project.”
O’Neill’s story isn’t just about changing habits, it’s also about leadership, and how change – true and lasting change – occurs when leaders become committed to an ideal.
Changing Organizational Culture
Improving safety in a company may require a major cultural shift.
Culture influences everything: how an organization identifies and solves business problems, recovers from failures, and thrives in times of success. It serves as a guiding force for employee behavior, shaping mindsets, attitude, and effort.
Changing culture happens when leaders make a conscious effort to align behaviour with strategy. All too often, top leaders boast about making a cultural shift – but then their daily actions, discussions, incentives, and openness to new ideas remain the same. Nothing truly changes.
The chances of true organizational change improve If all levels of leadership have an opportunity to shape the culture direction and trust that the changes (and sometimes sacrifices) they’re asked to make will be worth the effort.
Employees look to the person they trust – often their manager – and ask, “Do you believe in this?” The manager’s ultimate belief in the change is critical to its success. What is said (and not said), what is done (and not done), dictates whether the change will influence a broader group of employees.
Safety Is Not a Trade-off
Safety is often viewed as a competing interest in an organization. “Do you want to be safe, or do you want to make money?”
But is there really a trade off between saving money and saving lives?
In 2010, EHS Today featured a workplace safety study by VitalSmarts, which had examined 420 supervisors and managers, dividing them into two groups. The leaders in the first group were selected because they held their people accountable for every aspect of safety. The leaders in the second group were selected because they did not. The researchers wanted to test whether there were trade offs between safety and other priorities, or whether accountability in safety predicted success across all other priorities.
The findings couldn’t be more dramatic.
When the 20 percent of leaders who focused most on safety were compared to the other 80 percent, the safety-focused leaders were five times more likely to be in the top 20 percent on productivity, quality, efficiency, and employee satisfaction. The data clearly showed that being the best in workplace safety also leads to excellence in each of these other areas.
These results held true across industries as different as oil and gas exploration, chemical manufacturing, power generation, and construction. Regardless of the industry, the leaders who are best at holding their people accountable for safety also achieve the best quality, highest productivity, and greatest efficiency.
The Bottom Line
The United States Department of Labor reports that businesses spend $170 billion a year on costs associated with occupational injuries and illnesses – expenditures that come straight out of company profits.
But workplaces that establish effective and accountable health and safety programs can reduce their injury and illness costs by 20 to 40 percent. In today’s business environment, these costs can be the difference between operating in the black and running in the red.
Work-related injuries, illnesses, and deaths are costly to everyone. A safe and healthy work environment pays, in more ways than one. A safe workplace not only protects workers from injury and illness, it can also lower injury/illness costs, reduce absenteeism and turnover, increase productivity and quality, and raise employee morale.
Here is the bottom line: companies that focus on worker safety are simply better. Safety is good for business.
- Published in Online Training Courses
Different Learning Activities for Different Learning Styles
Different Learning Styles
Everyone learns in different ways. Some people like to jump in and get their hands dirty, learning by doing. Others like to sit back and listen to someone more experienced explain how a thing is done. Finally, there are others who prefer to read up on a topic.
There are three main learning styles: visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. Most people learn best through a combination of these three different styles, but typically favour one over the other.
- Visual Learners like to LOOK. They learn best by looking at pictures, videos, graphics, watching a demonstration, or reading up on a topic. Visual learners are able to memorize and recall written information better than other types of learners. For visual learners, it may be difficult to absorb new information from an instructor who is simply talking to them.
- Auditory learners like to LISTEN. They learn best by listening to things being explained, by reciting information out loud, and may concentrate better with soft music playing in the background. For auditory learners, it may be more difficult to process new information if all they’re doing is reading about it.
- Kinesthetic learners like to TOUCH. They learn best by actually doing an activity and having a “hands-on” experience. For kinesthetic learners, sitting still and reading may make it difficult to absorb new information.
Different Learning Activities for Different Learning Styles
The future of online training has arrived. The most effective online training programs are those that use different types of learning activities to better engage with the three main learning styles. Effective training programs use visuals, layered with audio voiceovers, and supplemented by interactive activities, or blended with hands-on learning.
The types of learning activities included in a course should depend upon the course audience, the material being taught, and the course length. Best practice teaches us it’s important to include a learning interaction every 5-10 minutes to reinforce the most relevant information covered.
Many online training developers are using a concept called ‘gamification’ which takes elements from game design and incorporates it into the online learning environment. The four most common gamification techniques are:
- Drag and Drop – These type of activities require a learner to pick up an object and move it with the mouse to a new location to elicit a response. They are the most common type of game-based activity used to engage learners and reinforce training material.
- Matching Activities – Matching activities ask the learner to make connections between objects. They are great for reinforcing definitions and testing understanding of relationships. Though terms and phrases are common in matching activities, symbols and pictures can be used to add visual interest.
- Hot Spots – Hot spots are locations on pictures that a learner can hover over with the mouse, click on, or drop an object onto in order to reveal information or elicit a correct response. Hot spots can ask learners to identify objects or merely be used to offer a more engaging way to provide additional information.
- Sequencing – Sequencing activities test a learner’s ability to place terms, procedures, objects, or images into logical order. Sequencing activities are great for testing learners’ recall of step-by step procedures and for providing students with an opportunity to practice the procedures as well.
- Published in Online Training Courses
Finding the Best Online Safety Training Programs
Under Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) Regulations, all employers have an obligation to ensure the workplace is safe. To make sure employees know how to stay safe on the job, employers must provide training to teach workers how to recognize potential hazards and how to safely use, handle, store, and dispose of hazardous substances. Employees must also be taught how to handle emergencies on the job.
Whether you’re in the construction industry, retail, manufacturing, electrical trade, or oil and gas sector, safety training is mandatory.
Safety training is instruction with site-specific information and occupation-specific procedures addressing worker safety. Training is an important part of understanding the hazards that may be present at a workplace, and preventing injuries on the job.
For some employers, providing the required safety training for all their employees and supervisors can be a challenge. In the past, many companies provided safety training in-house. However, over the past decade, we’ve seen a rise in the utilization of online safety training.
Online training is a cost-effective, flexible, and convenient form of safety training and is available from a host of different training companies. But how does an employer decide which safety training program is best for its workers and for the company?
Online Safety Training: What to Look For
The company you select to provide your online safety training should help you through every step in the education and certification process. Here are some of the most important factors to consider when choosing the best online safety training program provider:
- Wide selection of courses: Choose a company that has all the accredited courses needed to meet the OHS legislated requirements, as well as courses the company might require in the future to address potential growth. Selecting a company that offers a comprehensive library of online safety courses means employers don’t have to shop around for courses; they can enjoy one-stop shopping.
- Cost savings: One of the greatest advantages of online training is its cost-effectiveness. Ideally, the program you select should have options that maximize savings for your company. Look for online training companies that provide group discounts, corporate accounts, or discounts for specific industry members.
- Help and support: An online training program should offer users technical support as part of the training package. The last thing you want is for students to get stuck with a product they can’t use or courses they can’t complete because of technical problems.
- Training is competency-based: Competencies are the skills and knowledge required to complete a specific job. Many companies now use competency-based assessments to determine what training employees need to be successful in their work and to improve their effectiveness. An online training program that defines the competencies a specific program will address, helps supervisors and employees find the best training solutions.
- Content is interactive: No matter how good online training content is, if learners are not engaged it’s likely their attention will be lost. Learning activities that require the learner to interact with the material increases focus and retention. For example, drag and drop activities ask the learner to pick up an object with the mouse and move it to a new location in order to elicit a response, complete a task, or obtain a correct answer.
- Uses real-world images: Some learners lose interest quickly in a program if they feel it doesn’t apply to them or their work. For example, cartoon-type graphics used in a training program can quickly leave an adult learning feeling uninterested or patronized. Effective online training should use real-world pictures and simulations, including video clips, technical animation, and decision trees.
- Low mechanical repetition: Often online courses are developed as glorified PowerPoint decks, with little interaction between the student and the material. Essentially, the student just keeps clicking an advance arrow to take them to the next slide. This repetitiveness becomes automatic and the student grows bored with the material. Ideally, coursework should require a variety of tasks, with an activity every 5 – 10 minutes to keep students interested and excited to find out what’s coming next.
- Voiceovers are used: There are several different types of learning styles. Some people are readers and some are listeners. Courses that use a combination of visuals, reading, and audio voiceovers have proven to be the most effective way to deliver online content, and meet the needs of a broader range of students.
- Content is current: The Occupational Health and Safety landscape is not static; it is constantly changing. The best training programs are those that are responsive to changes in the regulations, as well as the best practices in a broad spectrum of industries.
- Uses a variety of testing: In the same way that repeated clicking tends to become monotonous and lower efficacy, using the same testing methods throughout the training program can also lead to disengagement. Courses should use a variety of testing including multiple choice, true or false, and fill-in-the-blank. To ensure that no two exams are ever the same, each learner should be presented with an exam comprised of questions randomly chosen from a central question pool. This is particularly important for learners who have to re-test in the same program.
- Published in Online Training Courses